Speech Etiquette as the Main Component of the Over-Professional Skills of a Higher Education Institutions’ Lecturer
Bielikova O. V.1, Dytiuk S. O.1, Krech T. V.1, Adamia Z.2
 
Kharkiv National University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Ukraine
Tskhum-Abkhazian Academy of Sciences, Georgia
 
Abstract
Background: The relevance of the study lies in the need of studying lecturer’s language etiquette, his role in the formation of a professionally oriented personality in terms of improving the system of higher education, in the process of implementing new requirements and standards of education. Purpose: To identify the components of lecturer’s language etiquette, which are important for students of higher education, as well as to identify ways of their formation and development. Materials and Methods: A questionnaire was developed using Google Forms to implement the study. The questionnaire was distributed by e-mail among 70 students from Kharkiv National University of Civil Engineering and Architecture (Kharkiv, Ukraine) and 40 students from Sukhum State University (Tbilisi, Georgia). Results: The survey allowed to find that the main principles of language etiquette of the lecturer are: politeness, tact, kindness, tolerance, friendliness, ability to listen, others. Among the violations of the rules of language etiquette of the lecturer, which are most common, students noted the following: talking in “high tones”, excessive categorical statements, hostility, tactlessness, rudeness, bias, arrogance, others. Conclusions: The most popular in the process of pedagogical communication are the lecturer’s competencies, such as listening skills, managing their emotions and states, interaction with students based on understanding their values and needs, tact, politeness, tolerance, friendliness. Especially important are the skills of building effective speech, establishing and maintaining a communicative balance in the audience, creating an atmosphere of trust, psychological comfort, open and equal cooperation. These skills and abilities become especially relevant in the era of digitalization and the transition to blended learning.
 
 
 
Keywords
Language etiquette of a lecturer, professional competence, personality-oriented approach, superprofessional skills, effective language expression, maintaining communicative balance agriculture
 
 
 
References

Andreeva, G. M. (2014). Sotsialnaya psihologiya [Social psychology] (5th ed.). Aspekt Press [in Russian]

Annushkin, V. I. (2014). Kultura rechi i ritorika kak chast rechevyih distsiplin v sovremennoy rechevoy praktike [Culture of speech and rhetoric as part of speech disciplines in modern speech practice]. Ecology of language and communicative practice. 1, 14–25 [in Russian]

Batsevich, F. S. (2009). Dukhovna synerhetyka ridnoi movy: Linhvofilosofski narysy [Spiritual synergetics of the native language: Linguophilosophical essays]. Academy [in Ukrainian]

Bielikova, O., Dytiuk, S., & Krech, T. (2019). Special moments in Ukrainian and foreign students perception of a lecturer’s personality. International Journal of Education and Science, 2(1), 14–21. http://doi.org/10.26697/ijes.2019.1.02

Bobylev, B. G., Kolomytseva, O. N., & Kosheleva, S. V. (2006). Russkij yazyk i kultura rechi [Russian language and culture of speech]. Orel State Technical University. https://rucont.ru/efd/151797 [in Russian]

Collins, M. L. (1978). Effects of enthusiasm training on preservice elementary lecturers. Journal of Teacher Education, 29(1), 53–57. https://doi.org/10.1177/002248717802900120

Dityuk, S. O., & Krech, T. V. (2017). Pedahohika vyshchoi shkoly [Higher school pedagogy]. Vidavnitsvo Ivanchenko І. S. [in Ukrainian]

Feldman, К. А. (1976). The superior college lecturer from the students’ view. Research in Higher Education, 5, 243–288. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00991967

Formanovskaya, N. I. (2006). Russkiy rechevoy etiket: lingvisticheskiy i metodicheskiy aspekty [Russian speech etiquette: Linguistic and methodological aspects] (3rd ed.). URSS. [in Russian]

Golub, I. B. (2009). Russkiy yazyk i kultura rechi [Russian language and culture of speech]. Logos. http://www.hi-edu.ru/e-books/xbook083/01/ [in Russian]

Hoffman, R. W. (1963). Students portray the excellent lecturer. Improving College & University Teaching, 11, 21–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/00193089.1963.10532204

Krutetskiy, V. A. (1976). Psikhologiya obucheniya i vospitaniya shkolnikov [Psychology of teaching and upbringing of schoolchildren]. Prosveshcheniye [in Russian]

Kan-Kalik, V. A. (1987). Uchitelyu o pedagogicheskom obshchenii: kniga dlya uchitelya [Lecturer about pedagogical communication: a book for the lecturer]. Prosveshcheniye. https://www.booksite.ru/fulltext/kankal/text.pdf [in Russian]

Kichuk, N. V. (Ed.) (2007). Kompetentnost samorazvitija specialista: pedagogicheskie osnovy formirovanija v vysshej shkole [Competence of the specialist’s self-development: The pedagogical foundations of the formation in higher education]. IGGU. [in Russian]

Kharlamov, I. F. (2015). Pedagogika [Pedagogy] (4th ed.). Gardariki. https://lib.uni-dubna.ru/search/files/psy_harlamov/1.pdf [in Russian]

Lane, D. A. (1989). Bullying in school: The need for an integrated approach. School Psychology International, 10(3), 211–215. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034389103007

Matsko, L., & Kravets, L. (2007). Kultura ukrainskoi fakhovoi movy [Culture of the Ukrainian professional language]. Akademiya. http://194.44.152.155/elib/local/sk710976.pdf [in Ukrainian]

Melnyk, Y., & Pypenko, I. (2017). Innovative potential of modern specialist: the essence and content. In Yu. B. Melnyk (Ed.), Psychological and pedagogical problems of modern specialist formation (pp. 9–16). ANAGRAM; KRPOCH. https://doi.org/10.26697/9789669726094.2017.9

Melnyk, Yu. (2017). Study of trends of students’ demand for the formation of competences by higher educational institutions. Science and Education, 5, 128–134. https://doi.org/10.24195/2414-4665-2017-5-22

Mikhalskaya, A. K. (1998). Osnovy ritoriki: mysl i slovo [Fundamentals of rhetoric: Thought and word]. Prosveshcheniye [in Russian]

Ortynskiy, V. L. (2017). Pedahohika vyshchoi shkoly [High school pedagogy]. Center for Literature Studies. https://subject.com.ua/pdf/254.pdf [in Ukrainian]

Ovcharuk, O. V. (Ed.). (2004). Kompetentnostnyj podhod v sovremennom obrazovanii: mirovoj opyt i ukrainskie perspektivy: Biblioteka po obrazovatelnoj politike [Competence approach in modern education: international experience and Ukrainian perspectives: Library for educational policy]. K.I.S. [in Russian]

Panina, S. V., & Makarenko, T. A. (2017). Samoopredeleniye i professionalnaya oriyentatsiya uchashchikhsya [Self-determination and professional orientation of students] (3rd ed.). Yurayt. [in Russian]

Podlasiy, I. P. (2015). Pedagogika [The pedagogy]. VLADOS. [in Russian]

Pryshchak, M. D. (2010). Komunikatsia, spilkuvannia, komunikatyvnist: katehorialny analiz [Communication, intercourse, communicativity]. Bulletin of the Vinnytsia Polytechnic Institute, 2, 5–8. https://visnyk.vntu.edu.ua/index.php/visnyk/article/view/1696 [in Ukrainian]

Rudneva, T. I., Astakhova, S. V., & Lapshova, E. S. (2007). Professionalnaya podhotovka spetsialistov humanitarnoho profilia [Professional training of specialists of humanitarian profile]. Samara University [in Russian]

Slastenin, V. A., Isayev, I. F., & Shiyanov, Ye. N. (2015). Pedagogika [The pedagogy]. School Press. [in Russian]

Sagach, G. M. (2000). Rytoryka [Rhetoric] (2nd ed.). Vidavnichy Dim “In Yure”. http://padaread.com/?book=85659&pg=3 [in Ukrainian]

Tkachova, T. M. (2015). Rol lichnosti v obespechenii kachestva prfessionalnoy podgotovki vypusknikov vuza [The role of the individual in ensuring the quality of vocational training of graduates of the university]. MADI [in Russian]

Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. (2017, November 16). Zakon Ukrainy “Pro osvitu” [Law of Ukraine “On the Education”]. https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2145-19#Text [in Ukrainian]

Vvedenskaya, L. A., Pavlova, L. G., & Kashaeva, E. Yu. (2007). Russkiy yazyik i kultura rechi [Russian language and culture of speech]. Phoenix. https://www.twirpx.com/file/872972 [in Russian]

Zimnyaya, I. A. (2010). Pedagogicheskaya psikhologiya [Pedagogical psychology] (3rd ed.). Institute of Psychology and Sociology; MODEK [in Russian]

Zaretskaya, E. N. (2002). Ritorika. Teoriya i praktika rechevoy kommunikatsii [Rhetoric. Theory and practice of language communication]. Delo. [in Russian]

Zyazyun, I. A., Kramushchenko, L. V., & Kryvonos, I. F. (Eds.). (2008). Pedahohichna maisternist [Pedagogical majorship]. SPD Bogdanova A. M. https://www.pedagogic-master.com.ua/public/PM_Zyazyun.pdf [in Ukrainian]

 
Information about the author:
Bielikova Olena Vitaliivna (Corresponding Author) – https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8580-112X; This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.; Kharkiv National University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Ukraine
Dytiuk Svitlana Oleksiivnahttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-1025-2071; Kharkiv National University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Ukraine
KrechTetiana Vasylivnahttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-0865-1716; Kharkiv National University of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Ukraine
Zoia Adamiahttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-6841-622X; Tskhum-Abkhazian Academy of Sciences, Georgia; International Scientific and Pedagogical Organization of Philologists "WEST-EAST" (ISPOP), Tbilisi, Georgia
Cite this article as: 
Bielikova, O. V., Dytiuk, S. O., Krech, T. V., & Adamia, Z. (2021). Speech etiquette as the main component of the over-professional skills of a higher education institutions’ lecturer. International Journal of Education and Science, 4(1), 18–25. https://doi.org/10.26697/ijes.2021.1.2
 
 
Лицензия Creative Commons
The articles, book reviews and other published items are licensed under a Creative Commons "Attribution" 4.0 Worldwide
The content of the website and its design are the property of the IJES and the KRPOCH Publishing. Copying and borrowing the content of the website in English or any other language is expressly prohibited. All Rights Reserved.